More John Doe Photoshops
- Posted by Justin Higgins on July 21st, 2007 in
The photoshopping over the John Doe Amendment continues. Michelle Malkin opens the flood gates to more photoshopping, and considering I kind of started this thing, I'll throw a few more in:
These are civil suits
You idiot... By "prosecution" I suppose I mean "plaintiff," but yes, the ACLU would be siding with the terrorists as they oft have.
m.e.atbrain
So sorry you have been assigned by the loons, or did you volunteer, to work on Sunday reading and replying to all the conservative, common-sense blogs! Take a vacation and come to your senses - especially get a sense of humor! JK
Fraid not
That's not a joke, Justin, it's yet another sign of your abysmal ignorance. The ACLU does not prosecute cases. That's the job of a District Attorney.
My Joke...
My joke was that the ACLU would be PROSECUTING...
Photoshop Comment
Hi. I love your added info on the "1944...." My suggestion is that you not suggest the ACLU (painfully quiet on the John Doe protection)! Instead, send those 1944 New Yorkers to the American Center for Law and Justice (www.ACLJ.org). Jay Sekulow has successfully argued many cases before the Supreme Court protecting American citizens' rights to speak freely about any issue in the work place and in public regarding their religious or any other deeply held beliefs. The Alliance Defense Fund, also, protects free speech rights. They have handled issues involving schools and students' rights.
I know you are busy! I am letting everyone I know about your Photoshop Protests.
Keep them coming! JKassel