More John Doe Photoshops

Justin Higgins — Sat, 2007-07-21 23:15

The photoshopping over the John Doe Amendment continues. Michelle Malkin opens the flood gates to more photoshopping, and considering I kind of started this thing, I'll throw a few more in:

Justin Higgins's blog
Login or register to post comments

These are civil suits

Justin Higgins — Sun, 2007-07-22 22:10

You idiot... By "prosecution" I suppose I mean "plaintiff," but yes, the ACLU would be siding with the terrorists as they oft have.

m.e.atbrain

Judith Kassel (not verified) — Sun, 2007-07-22 19:54

So sorry you have been assigned by the loons, or did you volunteer, to work on Sunday reading and replying to all the conservative, common-sense blogs! Take a vacation and come to your senses - especially get a sense of humor! JK

Fraid not

m.e.atbrain — Sun, 2007-07-22 17:30

That's not a joke, Justin, it's yet another sign of your abysmal ignorance. The ACLU does not prosecute cases. That's the job of a District Attorney.

My Joke...

Justin Higgins — Sun, 2007-07-22 15:30

My joke was that the ACLU would be PROSECUTING...

Photoshop Comment

JKassel (not verified) — Sun, 2007-07-22 14:50

Hi. I love your added info on the "1944...." My suggestion is that you not suggest the ACLU (painfully quiet on the John Doe protection)! Instead, send those 1944 New Yorkers to the American Center for Law and Justice (www.ACLJ.org). Jay Sekulow has successfully argued many cases before the Supreme Court protecting American citizens' rights to speak freely about any issue in the work place and in public regarding their religious or any other deeply held beliefs. The Alliance Defense Fund, also, protects free speech rights. They have handled issues involving schools and students' rights.
I know you are busy! I am letting everyone I know about your Photoshop Protests.
Keep them coming! JKassel